Once Sex Begins, ‘No” Means Nothing

Fantastic:

The appeals court said that when the jury asked the trial judge if a woman could withdraw her consent after the start of sex, the jury should have been told she could not. The ruling said the law is not ambiguous and is a tenet of common-law.

So if Clinton taught us that oral sex is truly sex then does that mean that once you start giving oral sex that you have no ability to stop the procession into intercourse?