Federal Grants Fund Abstinence Education – For Adults

The war on pleasure continues:

Now the government is targeting unmarried adults up to age 29 as part of its abstinence-only programs, which include millions of dollars in federal money that will be available to the states under revised federal grant guidelines for 2007. Abstinence education programs, which have focused on preteens and teens, teach that abstaining from sex is the only effective or acceptable method to prevent pregnancy or disease. They give no instruction on birth control or safe sex.

Can someone please fuck these people. I mean really – please have sex with them. The only reason they are so pent up about legislating the private sex lives of consenting adults is because they really really need some deep dicking.

This entry was posted in Sex on by .

About Andy

Gay Hoosier Taurus INFJ ex-playwright pianist gymbunny published author in San Francisco. Tw · Fb

8 thoughts on “Federal Grants Fund Abstinence Education – For Adults

  1. Bill

    Oh, Andy, you make me hornier than I already am!

    This puritanical view of all things sexual is a self-perpetuating idiocy of hyper-religionists. In their eyes sex = the devil. This belief has been at the core of every fundamentalist religion practiced across the centuries. The anti-sex viewpoint fosters sexual repression and makes sex titillating and prurient when it surfaces, as it is likely to do since we are sexual beings. The immature and ignorant stance taken on sex by these puritanical sorts is the one exteme which creates the other equally immature hypersexual focus that appears in our culture. It’s why sex becomes a punchline in so many jokes. It becomes lurid. This only makes the puritans work harder to force their viewpoint on the public. Your right, Andy, they all need a good deep-dicking. I could use one right now myself!

  2. Lyle Lachmuth - The Unsticking Coach

    Why don’t you say what you really feel Dude! 😉

    Seriously though, you may be on to something.

    I spent the first 1/3 of my life as a Fundamentalist Christian — talk about no Fun in FUNdamentalist.

    Sexual repression. Creative repression.

    If they had fun. Had sex. Did something to create and contribute. They’d have no time to be regulating others!

    Lyle

  3. Andy

    It is the same idea to get rid of violent extremists. People with families and children to feed are less likely to want to sacrifice their lives for a cause other than their home/hearth. Give the extremists something to lose.

  4. JB

    Why don’t they just go the whole way down the 1984 route and only allow sex between people who aren’t attracted to each other?

    “The aim of the Party was not merely to prevent men and women from forming loyalties which it might not be able to control. Its real, undeclared purpose was to remove all pleasure from the sexual act.”

  5. CP

    Deep dicking? You speak of sex as something designed for your own pleasure, self-centeredness is your cause; give me more pleasure, not give pleasure to another. If you want fulfilling sex – then truly love someone you would give your life for. Restrain from all current pleasure now and save it till you find the women truly worth waiting for and then marry her, dick her every night of the week if you like, several times a day. Focus on giving her pleasure and you will experience true sexual pleasure. I don’t know who is trying to suppress sexual fun? we are merely trying to teach the ignorant how to experience sex the way God intended and if you chose to experience sex with less pleasure, then continue in your ignorance and sexual self-gratification; continue thinking sex is merely a physical sensation. Go on and enjoy less then the best in complete sexual pleasure of spirit, soul, and body between to people who understand waiting till marriage builds desire and bonding between two people. The ability to control your self to please another only gives you control in the bed room to give ultimate pleasure. But sadly you all may never know the truth of this. I don’t care what you chose; “You get out of life what you seek to get” but don’t disregard those who seek to teach this truth, they teach it so that others may chose to seek a greater sexual pleasures. And not settle for the “I cant wait”, “no self control”, “ill take my pleasure now, thank you” crowd those who would rather win a million dollars then go out and learn how to make it. It is the difference between maturing and being immature

  6. Andy

    we are merely trying to teach the ignorant how to experience sex the way God intended and if you chose to experience sex with less pleasure, then continue in your ignorance and sexual self-gratification

    Is it always either/or? Sex can be purely recreational or invested with the full body/mind/spirit… it is find that you think God has told us the right way to have sex. It is not acceptable for those views to make it into government policy. Our sexuality is tightly connected to our divinity – we seek our divinity in our own ways.

  7. CP

    I agree with you on the government policy stuff, I don’t think it is the government’s job to fund it. But if they are going to fund other agendas like promoting sexual experimentation and homosexuality, then do not condemn the other side receiving funding to promote a form of sex that is completely natural and has nothing but a positive outcome.

    Your question (is it always either or?)

    I say Yes only because of the deeper issues not to bind you; so as to say you can’t do it, cause the truth of the matter is you can and you will. But I say yes because of (as you say spirit soul and mind) implications no matter what you try and do, you will always eventually hurt someone else mainly the women who is being used for the sex and then that poses a natural law problem; when do we chose to cross the line and injure someone in soul –emotional feeling) for our own pleasure and is that liberty for all? or is that me taking liberty to far? and again becoming selfish by looking to myself and not another person. That is what God’s word says the law is fulfilled in this one saying; -love God with all your heart and Love your neighbor as yourself- meaning if you love them as yourself your wouldn’t take advantage of them but rather suffer harm to see that they are ok

    Lets own up to choosing sin; and not try and say wrong is right and right is wrong. divinty is only found in seeking the divine and (we are only made in his image)

    True liberty is found in dicipline and the ablity to chose right and wrong, but it get muddy up when we try and blur the lines between right and wrong.

    Rather let us own up to our choices and live with them or change. not force wrong by teaching it and stifle truth because it eases the condemnation we feel inside by doing it!

    The truth is this condemnation is witness that there is a God and he has created a better way of living life here on earth not just hoping for somthing when we die, That is foolish thinking that God would create all of this and the pleasures in this life, and then tell us stay absatin from it until death.

    That is a lie!

    God’s word is true and it is life changing.

    It makes sense and it always will.

Comments are closed.